What is the top possible speed? Somewhere around 16 megabytes per second.
No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed.” These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second. “The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. Lawrence describes the impossibility like this: Those recent documents undergird the report’s first contention–the technological impossibility of the DNC breach having been a long-distance hack. There simply wasn’t much of any–until very recently. That’s a drum VIPS has been beating for awhile, but, of course, that’s not hard evidence. As VIPS noted, “If NSA cannot produce such evidence-and quickly-this would probably mean it does not have any.” They are: (1) William Binney, the NSA’s former technical leader who also designed many of the programs now in use by the agency (2) Kirk Wiebe, a former senior analyst with the NSA’s SIGINT Automation Research Center (3) Edward Loomis, the former technical director at the NSA’s Office of Signal Processing and (4) Ray McGovern, former chief of the CIA’s Soviet Foreign Policy Branch.įirst, VIPS noted, the NSA has the technical prowess to root out exactly what happened because their publicly known programs alone are capable of capturing any and all electronic transfers of data. Despite mostly being ignored by the media so far, VIPS diligently set to work on unraveling the cocoon of misinformation surrounding Russiagate and the DNC hack narrative.įour members of VIPS are currently concentrating on the task. The report mostly relies on the work of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), which was founded in 2003 in order to push back against the false claims of Iraqi WMD emanating from the second Bush White House. In other words, the DNC has (or had) a leak. Lawrence, by way of the experts’ findings, concludes that the so-called “hack” was actually an inside job by someone with internal access to the DNC’s computer network.
Published this week, the left-wing magazine’s report notes two bases for their conclusion: (1) hard science shows that a remote hack of the DNC servers resulting in the breach that actually occurred would have been technologically impossible (2) forensic review of the initial Guccifer 2.0 documents proves that they are poorly-disguised cut-and-paste jobs–forgeries–intended to finger Russia. The Nation‘s Patrick Lawrence wrote a lengthy review of the findings made by various computer experts formerly with the NSA.
A new report states categorically that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was not hacked by Russians–or anyone else–as frequently alleged by the mainstream media, liberal intelligentsia and anti-Trump politicians.
0 kommentar(er)
